Before we explain anything about the Normal-Model Framework (NMF), let’s try a simple experiment. Watch this short video1 and follow the instructions carefully. Don't read any further until you've watched the video.
The ‘answer’ is here. Did you notice everything? Maybe you did. Maybe you didn't. It doesn't matter. This isn't a test. The interesting question is not whether you spotted what you were supposed to spot. The interesting question is: Whydid you notice what you noticed?Everything was there. Nothing needed to be added to the video. Nevertheless, you noticed some signals and not others. You were looking — but looking isn't the same as noticing. And before you can think about something, judge it, understand it or decide what to do about it … it first has to become available to you.Now watch the same video again. Same video. Same signals. But this time you know something you didn't know before.Did you experience it differently? Of course you did. But here's the interesting part:The video didn't change. You did.The signal was there the first time. What changed was the receiver. And if a receiver can change once ... how else might it change?•Can we become better at noticing? •Can we learn what deserves another look?•Can we become better at judging what we notice? •Can we learn from the judgment calls we make? •And can what we learn today change what we notice tomorrow?That's where the Normal-Model Framework begins.We live in a world containing far more information than we could ever process. Our attention is finite. Our time is finite. Our effort is finite. We are finite. We can't give everything everything. Some things pass straight through. And some things snag. “Wait a second… what's this?”And when something snags, we have another choice to make.Is this worth more of my limited resources?That tiny question sits upstream of an extraordinary amount of what follows: Thinking | Judging | Deciding | Acting | Communicating|Learning.NMF is an attempt to open that process up and look inside. Not because we have all the answers. We don't. But because once something has been opened, it can be examined. And once it can be examined ... perhaps it can be improvedWhat if we could improve the receiver?Not only how people respond, but what becomes available for them to notice, investigate and judge in the first place?Small improvements may make little difference on their own. But we notice, judge, choose, communicate and learn repeatedly throughout our lives. Across thousands of decisions and millions of people, a very small difference could become a very large difference at scale.
A way. Not the way
NMF doesn't tell you what to think. It doesn't tell you what to notice. It doesn't tell you what ‘good’ means. And it doesn't tell you which choices you should make. You get the vote, you get to decide.What NMF offers is an architecture for looking more closely at how you got there. •What did you notice?•What didn't you notice?•What snagged?•What options did you see?•What did you eliminate? •What judgment call did you make? •What unit were you using? What ruler? Over what period of time?•And what happened next?
Could we get better at this?
That's the possibility we're interested in. Not perfect. Not better at everything. Not even better every time. Just better than we currently are. •One thing noticed that previously would have passed us by.•One judgment examined more carefully.•One assumption questioned.•One communication understood differently.•One decision we ourselves judge to be better than the one we would otherwise have made.That's enough. Because learning can change the receiver that encounters the next signal.And then the process begins again.
Normal-Model Framework
How receivers notice, judge and learn from difference
Before we explain anything about the Normal-Model Framework (NMF), let’s try a simple experiment. Watch this short video and follow the instructions carefully. Don't read any further until you've watched the video.
The ‘answer’ is here. Did you notice everything? Maybe you did. Maybe you didn't. It doesn't matter. This isn't a test. The interesting question is not whether you spotted what you were supposed to spot. The interesting question is: Whydid you notice what you noticed?Everything was there. Nothing needed to be added to the video. Nevertheless, you noticed some signals and not others. You were looking — but looking isn't the same as noticing. And before you can think about something, judge it, understand it or decide what to do about it … it first has to become available to you.Now watch the same video again. Same video. Same signals. But this time you know something you didn't know before.Did you experience it differently? Of course you did. But here's the interesting part:The video didn't change. You did.The signal was there the first time. What changed was the receiver. And if a receiver can change once ... how else might it change?•Can we become better at noticing? •Can we learn what deserves another look?•Can we become better at judging what we notice? •Can we learn from the judgment calls we make? •And can what we learn today change what we notice tomorrow?That's where the Normal-Model Framework begins.We live in a world containing far more information than we could ever process. Our attention is finite. Our time is finite. Our effort is finite. We are finite. We can't give everything everything. Some things pass straight through. And some things snag. “Wait a second… what's this?”And when something snags, we have another choice to make.Is this worth more of my limited resources?That tiny question sits upstream of an extraordinary amount of what follows: Thinking | Judging | Deciding | Acting | Communicating|Learning.NMF is an attempt to open that process up and look inside. Not because we have all the answers. We don't. But because once something has been opened, it can be examined. And once it can be examined ... perhaps it can be improved.What if we could improve the receiver?Not only how people respond, but what becomes available for them to notice, investigate and judge in the first place?Small improvements may make little difference on their own. But we notice, judge, choose, communicate and learn repeatedly throughout our lives. Across thousands of decisions and millions of people, a very small difference could become a very large difference at scale.
A way. Not the way
NMF doesn't tell you what to think. It doesn't tell you what to notice. It doesn't tell you what ‘good’ means. And it doesn't tell you which choices you should make. You get the vote, you get to decide.What NMF offers is an architecture for looking more closely at how you got there. •What did you notice?•What didn't you notice?•What snagged?•What options did you see?•What did you eliminate? •What judgment call did you make? •What unit were you using? What ruler? Over what period of time?•And what happened next?
That's the possibility we're interested in. Not perfect. Not better at everything. Not even better every time. Just better than we currently are. •One thing noticed that previously would have passed us by.•One judgment examined more carefully.•One assumption questioned.•One communication understood differently.•One decision we ourselves judge to be better than the one we would otherwise have made.That's enough. Because learning can change the receiver that encounters the next signal.And then the process begins again.
Normal-Model Framework
How receivers notice, judge and learn from difference